Build my stack
All beehiiv connections
Discover what apps integrate directly with beehiiv or sync parameters using webhook pipelines.
No connections documented for beehiiv yet
We have not yet verified any integrations for beehiiv. Rather than fill this page with claims we have not tested, we are leaving it short and telling you so plainly.
What each connection type actually means
Native integration
A direct, vendor-built connection between the two products. It is the cheapest to run and the most likely to be maintained when something changes.
API
You call one product's API from the other, usually through a small script or a workflow step. Flexible, and entirely your responsibility to keep working.
Webhook
One product posts to a URL when something changes. Cheap and event-driven, but you still need something on the receiving end to store the payload.
Via Zapier
Zapier holds the connection for you. No maintenance, and you pay per task in both money and in one more service that can fail.
Via n8n
The same idea as Zapier on infrastructure you control. Cheaper at volume, and you fix it yourself when a vendor changes an API.
Integration coverage across the category
Integration coverage matters more than most buyers expect, because it decides how much glue code your team maintains. We have verified integrations for 1 tool in email marketing, and the spread between them is wide.
Kit leads on coverage with 3 verified integrations, including 1 vendor-maintained connection.
Coverage counts here are what we have personally verified, not what the vendors claim. A vendor with forty integrations on their marketing page and two that actually work is worse off than one with four that all work, and that is the distinction this table is trying to make.
| Tool | Verified | Native | Vendor kept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kit | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| beehiiv | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MailerLite | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ActiveCampaign | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brevo | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Substack | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mailchimp | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GetResponse | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Constant Contact | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why you would want beehiiv at all
Integrations are the reason a tool is disqualified, but they are rarely the reason one is chosen. Beehiiv has rapidly become the most compelling platform for newsletter publishing by offering something no competitor fully delivers: a complete ecosystem for growing, monetizing, and optimizing a newsletter business under one roof. It suits newsletter writers, publishers, and media companies that want an all in one platform for audience growth, monetization, and analytics, and that is the part worth reading before you look at any connection list.
It costs $39 per month, with a free tier as well. Integration work has a cost too, and if you are going to build automations yourself through n8n, that cost belongs in the same column as the subscription.
Our price tracking shows the entry price up 2 percent since we started recording it, from $42 to $43 a month. Vendors that raise prices also tend to change integrations without warning, so lock your rate if you are confident about the choice.
The drawbacks we found in testing were higher starting price than substack and kit. the free plan caps at 2,500 subscribers and includes beehiiv branding. the scale plan at $39 per month is where valuable features unlock. substack charges zero platform fees (only 10 percent revenue share). kit's creator plan starts at $29 per month with no subscriber cap, the ad network takes a 30 percent cut of ad revenue. while beehiiv handles ad sales operations, creators who sell their own sponsorships keep 100 percent of revenue. the revenue share is a significant cost for newsletters that generate substantial ad income, and advanced automation is limited compared with dedicated email marketing platforms. beehiiv supports basic triggered sequences (welcome series, post publish) but lacks the conditional branching, lead scoring, and multi path workflows of activecampaign or kit. Integrations do not fix those, and it is worth knowing what they are before you wire this into your workflow.
If you need wider coverage
MailerLite starts at $10/mo (free tier available), undercutting beehiiv's $39/mo (free tier available) while covering the same core ground.
Lower price
Kit starts at $0, paid from $25/mo, undercutting beehiiv's $39/mo (free tier available) while covering the same core ground.
Lower price
ActiveCampaign starts at $15/mo, undercutting beehiiv's $39/mo (free tier available) while covering the same core ground.
Lower price
Brevo starts at $9/mo (free tier available), undercutting beehiiv's $39/mo (free tier available) while covering the same core ground.
Lower price
Substack is the pick when you want writers, journalists, and independent creators who want to start a paid newsletter or podcast with zero upfront cost and access to a built in audience discovery network, and it leads on ease of use.
Ease of Use
Integration questions
How many integrations does beehiiv have?
We have personally verified 0 integrations for beehiiv, which puts it at 0 in our coverage table for this category. None of them are vendor-maintained, which means you own the maintenance. We publish the number we have verified rather than the number the vendor markets.
Does beehiiv have a native integration or do I need Zapier?
Not for anything we have verified. Every connection we have for beehiiv runs through an automation platform rather than a native link, so there is no vendor-maintained path in our dataset.
Is Zapier or n8n better for connecting beehiiv?
Neither, on our current data. We have not verified an automation-platform connection for beehiiv, so we are not going to recommend a tool for a workflow we have not seen run.
What is the most integrated email marketing tool you track?
Kit, with 3 verified integrations in our dataset, 1 of which is maintained by the vendor. beehiiv has 0, so if deep integrations are a hard requirement rather than a nice to have, Kit is the safer choice on this evidence.
How do you test whether an integration actually works?
We connect the two tools with real data in both directions, trigger a change on one side, and confirm it lands on the other. Then we change something a second time, because an integration that works once is the normal failure mode. Anything we could not get working we list as broken rather than quietly dropping, and anything maintained by a third party we mark community.
Can I request an integration you have not tested?
Yes, and we would rather you asked than bought blind. Tell us which tool connects to which, and if it matters to real buyers we will test it and add the result with the steps we used. The gaps in this dataset are ours, not the vendor's, and we would rather close them than pretend they are not there.
Integration counts on this page are the connections we have personally verified, not the vendor's own marketing count. That is a smaller number, and it is the one that matters. We test a connection twice, because one that works once is the normal failure mode.