Build my stackSquare vs Gusto
Evaluating Square and Gusto requires comparing two popular options in the finance & payments space. While Square is widely recognized for its ability to help payments and POS for in-person businesses., Gusto is optimized for teams that need to focus on payroll and benefits small teams love.. In this hands-on evaluation, we look at their pricing structures, feature sets, user reviews, and performance to help you decide which tool fits your daily workflow best.
Based on our comprehensive evaluation metrics, Gusto emerges as the stronger overall choice for most teams, earning a score of 4.5 compared to 4.2 for Square. A key factor in this recommendation is that Gusto provides well established product with an active user base, which helps streamline workflows. However, Square remains an excellent alternative if your team is specifically looking for a tool optimized for payments and POS for in-person businesses. and you value well established product with an active user base. Weigh the cost differences and feature limits carefully before making a commitment.
Square vs Gusto at a glance
| Square | Gusto | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Finance & Payments | Finance & Payments |
| Our rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Starts at | 2.6% + 10c | $40/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Best for | Payments and POS for in-person businesses. | Payroll and benefits small teams love. |
How they scored, dimension by dimension
In our testing, Gusto comes out on top for ease of use with a rating of 4.6 versus 4.3 for Square. This difference reflects Gusto's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Square is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Gusto is the stronger option for features with a rating of 4.5 versus 4.2 for Square. This difference reflects Gusto's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Square is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Gusto edges ahead on value with a rating of 4.4 versus 4.1 for Square. This difference reflects Gusto's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Square is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Gusto has the clear advantage on support with a rating of 4.5 versus 4.2 for Square. This difference reflects Gusto's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Square is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
Where Square shines
- Well established product with an active user base
- Regular updates and clear roadmap
- Solid documentation and onboarding
- Our full hands-on testing is still in progress
- Pricing can climb on higher tiers
Where Gusto shines
- Well established product with an active user base
- Regular updates and clear roadmap
- Solid documentation and onboarding
- Our full hands-on testing is still in progress
- Pricing can climb on higher tiers
AI Head-to-Head Arbiter
Get an instant custom comparison and clear recommendation for your specific situation.
So which should you pick?
Choose Square if
- Built for payments and POS for in-person businesses.
- You want a real free tier before paying
- Budget is tight (from 2.6% + 10c)
- Well established product with an active user base
Choose Gusto if
- Built for payroll and benefits small teams love.
- ease of use and features matter most to you
- Well established product with an active user base
Common questions
Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy Square or Gusto through the links on this page, at no extra cost to you. We only compare tools we have tested, and commissions never change our scores or which tool we recommend. We currently track 218+ tools.