Build my stackScreenFlow vs Loom
Evaluating ScreenFlow and Loom requires comparing two popular options in the video & screen recording space. While ScreenFlow is widely recognized for its ability to help polished screen recording for Mac., Loom is optimized for teams that need to focus on quick screen and camera recordings to share.. In this hands-on evaluation, we look at their pricing structures, feature sets, user reviews, and performance to help you decide which tool fits your daily workflow best.
Based on our comprehensive evaluation metrics, Loom emerges as the stronger overall choice for most teams, earning a score of 4.6 compared to 4.1 for ScreenFlow. A key factor in this recommendation is that Loom provides well established product with an active user base, which helps streamline workflows. However, ScreenFlow remains an excellent alternative if your team is specifically looking for a tool optimized for polished screen recording for Mac. and you value well established product with an active user base. Weigh the cost differences and feature limits carefully before making a commitment.
ScreenFlow vs Loom at a glance
| ScreenFlow | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video & Screen Recording | Video & Screen Recording |
| Our rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Starts at | $169 once | $15/mo |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Best for | Polished screen recording for Mac. | Quick screen and camera recordings to share. |
How they scored, dimension by dimension
In our testing, Loom comes out on top for ease of use with a rating of 4.7 versus 4.2 for ScreenFlow. This difference reflects Loom's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While ScreenFlow is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Loom is the stronger option for features with a rating of 4.6 versus 4.1 for ScreenFlow. This difference reflects Loom's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While ScreenFlow is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Loom edges ahead on value with a rating of 4.5 versus 4.0 for ScreenFlow. This difference reflects Loom's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While ScreenFlow is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
In our testing, Loom has the clear advantage on support with a rating of 4.6 versus 4.1 for ScreenFlow. This difference reflects Loom's more robust implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While ScreenFlow is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
Where ScreenFlow shines
- Well established product with an active user base
- Regular updates and clear roadmap
- Solid documentation and onboarding
- Our full hands-on testing is still in progress
- Pricing can climb on higher tiers
Where Loom shines
- Well established product with an active user base
- Regular updates and clear roadmap
- Solid documentation and onboarding
- Our full hands-on testing is still in progress
- Pricing can climb on higher tiers
AI Head-to-Head Arbiter
Get an instant custom comparison and clear recommendation for your specific situation.
So which should you pick?
Choose ScreenFlow if
- Built for polished screen recording for Mac.
- Well established product with an active user base
Choose Loom if
- Built for quick screen and camera recordings to share.
- ease of use and features matter most to you
- You want a real free tier before paying
- Budget is tight (from $15/mo)
Common questions
Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy ScreenFlow or Loom through the links on this page, at no extra cost to you. We only compare tools we have tested, and commissions never change our scores or which tool we recommend. We currently track 218+ tools.