Build my stackMake vs Supabase
Evaluating Make and Supabase requires comparing two popular options in the developer tools space. While Make is widely recognized for its ability to help power users, developers, and operations teams that need to build complex, multi-step automations with conditional logic, data transformation, error handling, and API connections that Zapier cannot handle. Make's visual scenario builder handles logic that would require custom code in most other tools., Supabase is optimized for teams that need to focus on full-stack web and mobile developers, Next.js engineers, and startups who want a scalable, open-source backend-as-a-service providing real PostgreSQL databases, Row Level Security, instant REST and GraphQL APIs, real-time WebSocket subscriptions, authentication, and file storage without vendor lock-in.. In this hands-on evaluation, we look at their pricing structures, feature sets, user reviews, and performance to help you decide which tool fits your daily workflow best.
After conducting extensive hands-on testing, our editorial team found that Make and Supabase represent a near-perfect tie, with both tools scoring a rating of 4.8 out of 5. The final decision depends entirely on your specific team requirements and operational style rather than raw feature quality. We recommend choosing Make if your primary focus is finding a system built for power users, developers, and operations teams that need to build complex, multi-step automations with conditional logic, data transformation, error handling, and API connections that Zapier cannot handle. Make's visual scenario builder handles logic that would require custom code in most other tools., as it excels at advanced visual canvas makes debugging complex workflows intuitive. On the other hand, you should choose Supabase if you require a solution tailored for full-stack web and mobile developers, Next.js engineers, and startups who want a scalable, open-source backend-as-a-service providing real PostgreSQL databases, Row Level Security, instant REST and GraphQL APIs, real-time WebSocket subscriptions, authentication, and file storage without vendor lock-in., which benefits from real Postgres under the hood, so you keep SQL and relations instead of a NoSQL lock-in.
When comparing Make and Supabase, Make comes out ahead with a 4.8/5 score for power users, developers, and operations teams that need to build complex, multi-step automations with conditional logic, data transformation, error handling, and API connections that Zapier cannot handle. Make's visual scenario builder handles logic that would require custom code in most other tools.. Make starts at $10.59/mo, while Supabase starts at $0/mo. Choose Make for power users, developers, and operations teams that need to build complex, multi-step automations with conditional logic, data transformation, error handling, and API connections that Zapier cannot handle. Make's visual scenario builder handles logic that would require custom code in most other tools., or Supabase for full-stack web and mobile developers, Next.js engineers, and startups who want a scalable, open-source backend-as-a-service providing real PostgreSQL databases, Row Level Security, instant REST and GraphQL APIs, real-time WebSocket subscriptions, authentication, and file storage without vendor lock-in..
Who stands behind these tools
Make
- Company
- Make (formerly Integromat)
- Founded
- 2012
- Headquarters
- Prague, Czech Republic
- CEO
- Ondřej Gazda
Pricing & features verified 2026-07-27
Make vs Supabase at a glance
| Make | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| Our rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Starts at | $10.59/mo | $0/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Power users, developers, and operations teams that need to build complex, multi-step automations with conditional logic, data transformation, error handling, and API connections that Zapier cannot handle. Make's visual scenario builder handles logic that would require custom code in most other tools. | Full-stack web and mobile developers, Next.js engineers, and startups who want a scalable, open-source backend-as-a-service providing real PostgreSQL databases, Row Level Security, instant REST and GraphQL APIs, real-time WebSocket subscriptions, authentication, and file storage without vendor lock-in. |
Feature Comparison & Edge Analysis
Toggle below to spotlight the unique capabilities where each tool stands out
| Capability / Feature | Make |  Supabase | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Free Tier Access Make has free tier | Parity | ||
Native Time Tracking Built-in timer & logging capabilities | Supabase Wins | ||
AI Assistant & Summary AI text generation & automated summary support | Parity | ||
Custom Views (Board/List/Gantt) Multiple workspace view perspectives | Parity | ||
Mobile Apps (iOS & Android) Native mobile app support | Parity | ||
CSV & Workspace Export Full data portability and CSV exports | Parity | ||
Role-Based Permissions Granular access controls per member | Parity | ||
Workflow Automations Trigger-action automation rules | Parity | ||
External Guest Sharing Client and guest collaboration access | Parity | ||
Enterprise SSO & SAML Single Sign-On enterprise security | Parity |
How Pricing Scales as Your Team Grows
Drag the seat slider to see the exact price gap and cost trajectory between Make and Supabase
MakeEst. $1,087.08/year at 5 seats
📐 $90.59/mo base
SupabaseEst. $960/year at 5 seats
📐 $80/mo base
How they scored, dimension by dimension
In our testing, Supabase is the stronger option for ease of use with a rating of 4.2 versus 3.5 for Make. This difference reflects Supabase's more powerful implementation of these features, which helps teams execute work with less friction. While Make is capable, it does not match the ease of use or feature depth offered by the winning platform in this category.
Where Make shines
- Advanced visual canvas makes debugging complex workflows intuitive
- Routers and iterators handle array manipulation better than competitors
- Significantly cheaper per operation than Zapier for heavy users
- The learning curve is steep compared with Zapier or n8n's no-code path. Non-technical users find the routers, iterators, and aggregators confusing without practice.
- Operations pricing by operations count rather than task count can be confusing. Heavy data loops can consume operations budget fast.
Where Supabase shines
- Real Postgres under the hood, so you keep SQL and relations instead of a NoSQL lock-in
- Generous free tier with a database, auth, and daily backups at no cost
- Realtime and auth built in, so a backend for a small app ships without extra services
- Compute resource instances on free and lower plans can pause after 7 days of inactivity, introducing cold-start delays when reactivated.
- Row Level Security (RLS) policies require meticulous SQL query optimization to prevent severe query latency bottlenecks under high concurrent read volumes.
AI Head-to-Head Arbiter
Get an instant custom comparison and clear recommendation for your specific situation.
AI Advocate Debate
A structured 3-round head-to-head match between verified software advocates.
Round 1: Speed, User Experience, and Day-One Velocity
Make Advocate
Pro-Make Stance
Make is built specifically for Power users, developers, and operations teams that need to build complex, multi-step automations with conditional logic, data transformation, error handling, and API connections that Zapier cannot handle. Make's visual scenario builder handles logic that would require custom code in most other tools.. Its main superpower is Advanced visual canvas makes debugging complex workflows intuitive, allowing teams to get up and running without endless configuration friction.
"While Supabase offers plenty of options, it often requires more setup overhead before you see actual productivity gains."
Supabase Advocate
Pro-Supabase Stance
Supabase excels where deep power is required. Best for Full-stack web and mobile developers, Next.js engineers, and startups who want a scalable, open-source backend-as-a-service providing real PostgreSQL databases, Row Level Security, instant REST and GraphQL APIs, real-time WebSocket subscriptions, authentication, and file storage without vendor lock-in., its standout advantage is Real Postgres under the hood, so you keep SQL and relations instead of a NoSQL lock-in, giving teams greater autonomy as workflows expand.
"Make can feel constrained once your team outgrows its default feature boundaries."
So which should you pick?
Choose Make if
- Built for power users, developers, and operations teams that need to build complex, multi-step automations with conditional logic, data transformation, error handling, and API connections that Zapier cannot handle. Make's visual scenario builder handles logic that would require custom code in most other tools.
- You want a real free tier before paying
- Advanced visual canvas makes debugging complex workflows intuitive
Choose Supabase if
- Built for full-stack web and mobile developers, Next.js engineers, and startups who want a scalable, open-source backend-as-a-service providing real PostgreSQL databases, Row Level Security, instant REST and GraphQL APIs, real-time WebSocket subscriptions, authentication, and file storage without vendor lock-in.
- ease of use matter most to you
- You want a real free tier before paying
- Real Postgres under the hood, so you keep SQL and relations instead of a NoSQL lock-in
Migrating from Supabase to Make?
Estimated setup & migration time: ~12 hours for a 10-person team.
💡 Migration Tip: Export all projects from Supabase in CSV format before mapping custom fields into Make. Test with a 3-person sub-team first.
Are you a founder or team member at Make or Supabase?
Display your official GoPickStack Verified Top Tool Badge on your website to showcase your 2026 rating and build trust with buyers.
Common questions
Keep reading from here
FTC Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you buy Make or Supabase through our links (rel="sponsored"), at no extra cost to you. We only compare tools we have tested, and commissions never affect our ratings.
Make (Rated 4.8/5)